Aluminum Hydroxide

Evidence Level: L3 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Aluminum Hydroxide
  2. Aluminum Hydroxide: From Peptic Ulcer and Acid Reflux Disease to Active Peptic Ulcer Disease
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Aluminum Hydroxide: From Peptic Ulcer and Acid Reflux Disease to Active Peptic Ulcer Disease

One-Sentence Summary

Aluminum hydroxide is an antacid originally used for gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis and dyspepsia. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for active peptic ulcer disease, but this is essentially an on-label or near-label use rather than true repurposing. Evidence is limited: 0 registered clinical trials and 9 publications (mostly older reviews, mechanistic studies and historical reports) support this direction.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Gastric ulcer, peptic ulcer disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, dyspepsia, duodenal ulcer (from the knowledge graph; the approved indication text in the Singapore licences is blank)
Predicted New Indication Active peptic ulcer disease
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.64%
Evidence Level L3
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 14
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available. Based on known information, aluminum hydroxide is an acid-neutralizing antacid. It reduces gastric acidity and peptic (pepsin) activity, which is the basis of its existing peptic ulcer indication. Mechanistically it may be applicable to active peptic ulcer disease.

The predicted indication is very close to the original ones, so this is not a true change of disease area. The high score likely reflects the proximity of "active peptic ulcer disease" to "peptic ulcer disease" in the knowledge graph. The retrieved literature supports the plausibility of acid neutralization and mucosal protection. However, much of it concerns sucralfate (an aluminum-containing agent), antacid neutralizing-capacity testing, or a nizatidine trial, all of which relate only indirectly to aluminum hydroxide itself.

Other predictions on the list follow the same pattern. Gastroduodenitis and gastrojejunal ulcer are plausible because they are acid-related, but no study addresses them specifically. Peptic ulcer perforation, achlorhydria, pylorospasm, gastric dilatation, Dieulafoy lesion and cascade stomach have no supporting evidence. Several are mechanistically implausible. For example, achlorhydria is the absence of acid, and aluminum antacids can slow gastric emptying, which could worsen gastric dilatation.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
3018068 1986 Clinical physiology study J Clin Gastroenterol Compared the postprandial buffering of sodium bicarbonate with aluminum-magnesium hydroxide in duodenal ulcer patients
1526089 1992 RCT (different drug, nizatidine) Clin Pharmacol Ther 8-week placebo-controlled trial of nizatidine in benign gastric ulcer; not about aluminum hydroxide
3929601 1985 In vitro/mechanistic Am J Med Sucralfate, which contains aluminum hydroxide moieties, inhibits pepsin activity by raising pH and adsorbing pepsin
9334882 1997 Animal study Jpn J Pharmacol Aluminum hydroxide prevented acid- and pepsin-induced damage to rat gastric epithelial cells
3104655 1986 Review Klin Wochenschr Aluminum-containing antacids protect the gastric mucosa against aspirin- and ethanol-induced necrosis and haemorrhage
6798099 1981 Review (sucralfate) J Clin Gastroenterol Development of sucralfate to counteract acid and pepsin activity
35720246 2022 In vitro antacid comparison Med Pharm Rep Evaluated the acid-neutralizing capacity of antacids marketed in Morocco
7190055 1980 Review Brain Res Bull Restraint-induced ulcers in animals respond to known therapeutic agents, including cimetidine and aluminum hydroxide

Related evidence from a closely linked prediction: a controlled trial of aluminum hydroxide gel in duodenal ulcer pain (PMID 324863, 1977, Gastroenterology) found complete relief in 79% with the gel versus 45% with a dummy gel in one set of trials, but the difference was not significant in a replicate set.


Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN02930P ALU-TAB TABLET 600 mg Film-coated tablet Not stated in the data compiled for this report
SIN03159P ALUMAG TABLETS Tablet Not stated in the data compiled for this report
SIN09499P ALLUMAG M TABLET Tablet Not stated in the data compiled for this report
SIN06592P AXCEL EVILINE TABLET Tablet Not stated in the data compiled for this report
SIN03406P POLYSILIC III SUSPENSION Suspension Not stated in the data compiled for this report

There are 14 valid single-ingredient registrations in total. Dosage forms include tablets, film-coated tablets, suspensions and granules.


Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were found; the list reviewed includes the following.
    • Major: Dolutegravir, sodium citrate
    • Moderate: Acalabrutinib, doxycycline, alendronic acid, risedronic acid, allopurinol, amphetamine, ascorbic acid, acetylsalicylic acid, atazanavir, proguanil
    • Minor: Famotidine, ranitidine, and others
  • Safety signals from the literature: Long-term or excessive use of aluminum-containing antacids has been linked to phosphate depletion, osteomalacia and bone demineralization (PMIDs 7431592, 2257522, 6293043). Aluminum antacids may also slow gastric emptying and cause constipation.

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The predicted indication is essentially the same as the drug's existing use, so it does not add new therapeutic value. No clinical trials are registered, and the literature consists mainly of older studies, mechanistic work and studies of related drugs. The package insert warnings and contraindications are not yet available, so safety screening cannot be completed.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the HSA website (blocking item)
  • Mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Approved indication text for the Singapore licences, to confirm whether peptic ulcer is already on-label
  • A decision on whether to pursue the other predictions, which have little or no supporting evidence, or to drop them

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.