Avanafil

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Avanafil
  2. Avanafil: From Erectile Dysfunction to Amenorrhea
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Avanafil: From Erectile Dysfunction to Amenorrhea

One-Sentence Summary

Avanafil is an oral PDE5 inhibitor originally used to treat erectile dysfunction. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for amenorrhea, but no clinical trials and no publications currently support this direction, so it is a computational prediction only.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Erectile dysfunction (also psychologic dyspareunia and premature ejaculation, per the knowledge graph; the Singapore licence records contain no indication text)
Predicted New Indication Amenorrhea
TxGNN Prediction Score 94.59%
Evidence Level L5
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 3
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known pharmacology, avanafil is a PDE5 inhibitor. It raises cGMP levels and promotes smooth muscle relaxation and vasodilation, which underlies its effect in erectile dysfunction.

A hypothetical link to uterine or pelvic blood flow exists. However, amenorrhea is mainly driven by dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, so the connection to PDE5 inhibition is weak. The high TxGNN score is a computational output without clinical or literature support, and it should be treated as a hypothesis rather than a finding.

Other predictions reviewed (all L5, no trials or publications):

Rank Predicted Disease Score Assessment
2 Hypoalphalipoproteinemia 91.54% No clear link between PDE5 inhibition and HDL metabolism
3 Malignant catarrh 90.62% Veterinary viral disease in ruminants; likely a knowledge-graph artifact
4 Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis 90.62% Cattle herpesvirus infection; likely a knowledge-graph artifact
5 Raynaud disease 88.54% Biologically the most plausible; sildenafil and tadalafil have been studied, but there is no avanafil-specific evidence
6 Ambras type hypertrichosis universalis congenita 87.79% Rare hair-follicle development disorder; no link to the PDE5/cGMP pathway
7 Obsolete susceptibility to ischemic stroke 87.28% Obsolete ontology term; not a suitable clinical target
8 Malformation syndrome with odontal and/or periodontal component 80.46% Heterogeneous congenital syndromes; not mechanistically interpretable
9 Stroke disorder 79.21% Plausible but indirect preclinical rationale for the class
10 Adrenal gland hyperfunction 79.06% No established link

Raynaud disease is the only alternative flagged as a research question. Any further work would first require a separate review of class-level PDE5 inhibitor evidence.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

Currently no related literature available.

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN15880P SPEDRA TABLET 50MG Tablet Not listed in the data
SIN15879P SPEDRA TABLET 100MG Tablet Not listed in the data
SIN15881P SPEDRA TABLET 200MG Tablet Not listed in the data

All three are single-ingredient products from MENARINI VON HEYDEN GmbH, and all are currently valid. Only the oral route is available.

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 53 known interactions were identified. Examples by severity:
    • Major: Aprepitant, Clarithromycin, Amyl Nitrite, Cobicistat
    • Moderate: Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Empagliflozin, Ertugliflozin, Dexamethasone, Lorcaserin, Papaverine, Troglitazone, Ethanol, Deferasirox, Diazoxide, Phentolamine, Nitrous acid, Fostamatinib, Epoprostenol, Iloprost
  • Cardiovascular safety (hypotension, interactions with nitrates and antihypertensives) would need review in any new patient population, particularly stroke.

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The amenorrhea prediction has a high model score but no clinical trials or publications behind it, and the mechanistic link is weak. Evidence is L5 (model prediction only), so there is not enough support to move forward.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the HSA website (needed before any safety screening)
  • Detailed mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Clinical or mechanistic evidence specific to avanafil in amenorrhea
  • If a more plausible direction is wanted, a separate review of PDE5 inhibitor class evidence for Raynaud disease
  • A safety plan for the cardiovascular and drug-interaction risks in any new target population

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.