Bupivacaine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Bupivacaine
  2. Bupivacaine: From Dermatitis to Acrodermatitis Chronica Atrophicans
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Bupivacaine: From Dermatitis to Acrodermatitis Chronica Atrophicans

One-Sentence Summary

Bupivacaine is a long-acting local anaesthetic, listed in the knowledge graph used by the model with dermatitis as its original indication. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, but no clinical trials and no publications currently support this prediction. The high score is a computational result only and has no supporting mechanism or clinical evidence.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Dermatitis (from the knowledge graph; the Singapore licence records contain no indication text)
Predicted New Indication Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.23%
Evidence Level L5
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 4
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the compiled data. Bupivacaine is a local anaesthetic of the amide class and is generally understood to block sodium channels in nerves. It is used for nerve blocks, infiltration and spinal anaesthesia, not as a disease-modifying treatment for skin conditions.

Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans is a late-stage skin infection caused by Borrelia. A local anaesthetic has no plausible way to treat the infection itself. At most it could relieve local pain or neuropathic symptoms. The high score probably reflects closeness to dermatitis-related nodes in the knowledge graph rather than a true biological link.

The other top-ranked predictions show the same pattern. Dermatomyositis variants, connective tissue disease-associated lung disease, acne keloid, familial hydroa vacciniforme and middle ear polyp have no clinical or literature evidence and no plausible mechanism.

Predictions with some evidence (uterine polyp, epulis, vocal cord polyp) concern bupivacaine as procedural anaesthesia or a co-injected agent. They do not show that it treats the disease itself.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials are registered for acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans.

For context, trials found for lower-ranked predictions are all procedural and not disease treatment:

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT05967936 Not applicable Unknown 242 Compares types of local anaesthesia in outpatient hysteroscopy (uterine polyp); concerns anaesthetic technique, not polyp treatment
NCT06734975 Phase 2 Recruiting 28 Superior laryngeal nerve block vs saline during laryngoscopy for benign vocal fold lesions; endpoints are perioperative cough, pain and voice, no results yet

Literature Evidence

Currently no related literature is available for acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans.

For context, publications found for lower-ranked predictions are indirect:

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
22070928 2012 Case series J Minim Invasive Gynecol Low-dose spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl for operative hysteroscopy in high-risk patients
11862204 2002 Case series Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Intralesional corticosteroid mixed with bupivacaine or lidocaine for central giant cell granuloma; the effect comes from the corticosteroid
19941766 2009 Case series J Dent Child Intralesional corticosteroid injection for central giant cell granuloma in a child
29750618 2018 Case report J Clin Pediatr Dent Modified technique for central giant cell lesion in children, with intralesional corticosteroid
16910145 2006 Case report Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim Transient neurological syndrome after spinal hyperbaric bupivacaine following polyp removal (an adverse event)

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN05681P MARCAIN SPINAL 0.5% HEAVY INJECTION Injection Not stated in the compiled data
SIN05679P MARCAIN INJECTION 0.5% (POLYAMP DUOFIT) Injection Not stated in the compiled data
SIN13211P Marcain Injection 0.5% (4ml) Injection Not stated in the compiled data
SIN14273P SURGICAINE Injection Injection Not stated in the compiled data

All four licences are valid single-ingredient injectable products. No topical formulation is registered.


Safety Considerations

Contraindications suggested by the knowledge graph (these are graph associations, not package insert text):

  • Cardiovascular: hypertension, hypotension, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart conduction disease, sudden cardiac arrest
  • Hepatic and renal: liver failure, liver disease, kidney disease, gallbladder disease
  • Respiratory: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, respiratory failure
  • Metabolic and endocrine: diabetes mellitus, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypothyroidism, potassium deficiency
  • Other: epilepsy, angle-closure glaucoma, inflammatory bowel disease, benign prostatic hyperplasia, hemoglobinopathy, substance abuse/dependence

Drug Interactions: 56 interactions were recorded. Those with a graded level are moderate, with aprepitant and liposomal morphine. The rest have no graded level, including proton pump inhibitors (pantoprazole, omeprazole, lansoprazole), corticosteroids (dexamethasone, prednisone, hydrocortisone, prednisolone, triamcinolone), ondansetron, metoclopramide, famotidine, ranitidine, simvastatin, vancomycin, metronidazole, atropine, naloxone and potassium chloride.

Please also refer to the package insert for full warnings and contraindications. Bupivacaine is myotoxic and has been associated with transient neurological syndrome after spinal use, as shown in the literature above.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The prediction is a model output only (L5), with no trials or publications for acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans. A local anaesthetic has no plausible disease-modifying mechanism against a Borrelia skin infection. The other top-ranked predictions are also unsupported or only procedurally related.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the HSA (currently missing and blocking safety screening)
  • Mechanism of action data
  • Evidence of a plausible mechanism or clinical benefit in the predicted indication (beyond symptomatic pain relief)
  • Clarification of the original indication, since the licence records contain no approved indication text and "dermatitis" comes only from the knowledge graph
  • Route and formulation compatibility assessment, since all registered products are injectables

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.