Cefazolin

Evidence Level: L4 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Cefazolin
  2. Cefazolin: From Bacterial Pneumonia and Other Bacterial Infections to Infectious Otitis Media
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Cefazolin: From Bacterial Pneumonia and Other Bacterial Infections to Infectious Otitis Media

One-Sentence Summary

Cefazolin is a first-generation cephalosporin antibiotic, originally used for bacterial infections such as pneumonia, endocarditis, bacterial arthritis and cholangitis. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for infectious otitis media, but no clinical trials are registered and only 2 publications (a case report and an unrelated review) touch on this direction, so the prediction rests mainly on the model score.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Bacterial pneumonia, endocarditis, bacterial arthritis, cholangitis (from the knowledge graph; the approved indication text on the Singapore licences is blank)
Predicted New Indication Infectious otitis media
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.44%
Evidence Level L4
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 6
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, cefazolin is a first-generation cephalosporin that inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding penicillin-binding proteins. It is active against Gram-positive cocci such as Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci, and mechanistically may be applicable to otitis media caused by these organisms.

The original indications (staphylococcal and streptococcal pneumonia, endocarditis, bacterial arthritis) are Gram-positive-driven infections. Some otitis media pathogens overlap with these. However, cefazolin has limited activity against Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis, the most common causes of acute otitis media. This weakens the link.

The only supporting literature is indirect: a 2025 case report of ceftazidime-cefazolin empiric therapy for pediatric Gradenigo syndrome (a complication of otitis media). The other retrieved paper, on Stevens-Johnson syndrome management (1986), is not relevant.

Other related predictions show a similar pattern:

  • Suppurative otitis media has a 1982 comparative study (cefmetazole vs cefazolin, 172 evaluable patients) in which cefazolin was only the comparator.
  • Urinary tract infection is mechanistically credible, because cefazolin is excreted in urine and active against many Enterobacterales. There is still no direct randomized evidence.
  • Bronchitis is plausible for bacterial cases only, and the evidence is old (1975–1988).

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered for infectious otitis media.

For reference, the only trial linked to any of the top-ranked predictions is for urinary tract infection:

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01349738 N/A Unknown 200 Observational study of asymptomatic bacteriuria and UTI risk in renal transplant patients; does not test cefazolin efficacy

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
39567876 2025 Case report Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Ceftazidime-cefazolin empiric therapy for pediatric Gradenigo syndrome, a complication of acute otitis media
3742953 1986 Review Clin Pharm Management of Stevens-Johnson syndrome; otitis media appears only as the context of the case. Not relevant to efficacy

Related evidence for other predicted indications:

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
6752467 1982 Comparative clinical study Jpn J Antibiot Cefmetazole vs cefazolin in suppurative otitis media (172 patients analysed); cefazolin was the comparator
6352642 1983 Comparative clinical study J Antimicrob Chemother Ceftazidime vs cefazolin plus tobramycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (59 patients)
1117117 1975 Cohort/Clinical study J Am Geriatr Soc Cefazolin in 15 elderly patients with respiratory infections; 13 had excellent to good results

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN14846P Cefazolin Mevon Powder for Solution for Injection or Infusion 1g/vial Injection, powder, for solution Not stated
SIN12471P Cezolin Injection 1 gm/vial Injection, powder, for solution Not stated
SIN07879P Cefazolin Sandoz 1 g/vial Injection, powder, for solution Not stated
SIN14304P Zepilen Powder for Injection 1g/vial Injection, powder, for solution Not stated
SIN15018P Cefazolin-AFT Powder for Injection 500mg/vial Injection, powder, lyophilized, for solution Not stated

A sixth licence, SIN14480P (Cefazolin-AFT 1g/vial), is also valid. All six are single-ingredient injectable products and none has been cancelled.

Safety Considerations

  • Contraindications (from knowledge graph, not label text): blood coagulation disease, Clostridium difficile colitis, perinatal necrotizing enterocolitis, congenital prothrombin deficiency.
  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were found in total. The main moderate-level ones are with aminoglycosides (kanamycin, neomycin, streptomycin) and picosulfuric acid. Many others (e.g. amphotericin B, aspirin, metformin, morphine, omeprazole) are of unknown severity.

Please refer to the package insert for full warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The prediction for infectious otitis media rests almost entirely on the model score. No clinical trials exist, and the only relevant literature is a single case report. Cefazolin's weak coverage of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, the main otitis media pathogens, further reduces the likelihood of benefit. Among the top-ranked predictions, suppurative otitis media (L3) and urinary tract infection (L4) have somewhat stronger rationale, and both are marked as research questions rather than candidates for adoption.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the Singapore regulator, as the safety review cannot move forward without them
  • Mechanism of action data from DrugBank
  • Local otitis media pathogen and susceptibility data to test whether cefazolin coverage is adequate
  • Direct comparative human studies of cefazolin in otitis media (none currently exist)
  • Consideration of suppurative otitis media or urinary tract infection as better-supported alternative directions

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.