Chromium

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Chromium
  2. Chromium: From No Established Indication to Osteoarthritis
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why Is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Chromium: From No Established Indication to Osteoarthritis

One-Sentence Summary

Chromium (DB11136) is an essential trace mineral with no currently registered drug indication in Singapore; as a dietary supplement, it is most commonly associated with supporting insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism. The TxGNN model predicts it may have therapeutic value for Osteoarthritis, with 1 terminated Phase 2 trial and 20 retrieved publications — the vast majority of which concern chromium as a wear product from metal joint implants rather than as a therapeutic agent. This distinction represents a fundamental evidence quality issue, and the overall recommendation is Hold pending clarification of the terminated trial and a dedicated mechanistic evidence base.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication No registered drug indication
Predicted New Indication Osteoarthritis
TxGNN Prediction Score 98.68%
Evidence Level L3
Singapore Market Status ✗ Not marketed
Number of Registrations 0
Recommended Decision Hold

Why Is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data for Chromium is not available in this Evidence Pack. Based on known pharmacology, trivalent chromium (Cr³⁺) is an essential trace mineral widely studied as a dietary supplement. Its proposed biological activity centres on potentiating insulin receptor tyrosine kinase signalling — an effect attributed to a low-molecular-weight chromium-binding oligopeptide (LMWCr). By improving insulin sensitivity, Cr³⁺ may theoretically dampen systemic low-grade inflammation mediated through NF-κB and downstream pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6), which are implicated in cartilage degradation and synovitis in osteoarthritis.

However, there is a critical structural problem with this TxGNN prediction: the high score likely reflects reverse causation bias in the knowledge graph. The overwhelming majority of trials and publications linking chromium to osteoarthritis arise from metal-on-metal (MoM) orthopaedic implant research, where cobalt-chromium alloy components release Cr³⁺/Cr⁶⁺ ions as wear debris — causing harm to joint tissue, not treating it. Chromium appears alongside osteoarthritis in the literature primarily as a contaminant and potential toxin, not as a beneficial agent.

The only directly relevant therapeutic trial identified (NCT00759993, Phase 2) was terminated before completion. The reason for termination is unknown from available records, which constitutes the most important unanswered question for this indication: whether stopping was due to safety signals, lack of efficacy, or administrative/funding issues will entirely determine the viability of this repurposing hypothesis.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00759993 Phase 2 Terminated 60 Chromium picolinate for prevention of serotonergic medication-induced weight gain in psychiatric inpatients; the only trial directly testing chromium supplementation in a clinical context — terminated early, reason unknown
NCT00862511 N/A Completed 120 Serum chromium ion monitoring after coated vs. uncoated total knee arthroplasty — implant corrosion monitoring study, not chromium therapy
NCT02196792 N/A Active, not recruiting 100 Polyethylene wear and metal ion levels in total hip replacement — monitoring study
NCT04585022 N/A Terminated 75 Cr/Co ion concentrations in MoM hip arthroplasty at 5-year follow-up — terminated
NCT00561600 N/A Completed 265 DePuy ASR-XL vs. Pinnacle hip system — involves voluntarily recalled implant; Cr ions monitored as safety signal
NCT05357378 N/A Recruiting 288 HIT Reverse Hip Replacement System safety and effectiveness — new device safety study
NCT03382652 N/A Completed 83 Continuum Metal Bearing System post-market surveillance — implant survival monitoring
NCT05815953 N/A Active, not recruiting 60 Polarstem vs. Corail femoral stem micromotion comparison using radiostereometry — implant comparison
NCT00586781 Phase 3 Completed 21 STAR ankle replacement bilateral safety study — ankle device trial; chromium present only as implant material
NCT04058743 N/A Terminated 8 Nickel sensitivity and TKA outcomes — metal hypersensitivity study, not chromium supplementation

⚠️ Evidence quality alert: With the sole exception of NCT00759993, all trials listed above study chromium as a component of metal implants being monitored for safety — not as a therapeutic intervention. The evidence base for chromium supplementation in osteoarthritis is essentially absent.


Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
34628351 2021 Observational EBioMedicine Differential synovial fibroblast subsets at painful vs. non-painful sites in knee OA — OA pathophysiology; no chromium link
34724103 2023 Cohort Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Co/Cr ion levels after MoM hip revision with dual-mobility liners — monitoring of harmful ions
37394959 2023 Cohort Bone Joint J Elevated serum Cr associated with worse Harris Hip Score and HOOS in ASR resurfacing patients — high Cr is detrimental
36945025 2023 Observational J Orthop Surg Res Cr/Co ion levels and oxidative stress markers in modular hip arthroplasty — ions linked to oxidative damage
27294138 2016 Cross-sectional BioMed Res Int Environmental Cr concentrations in cartilage and bone of OA patients in NW Poland — environmental exposure context
33550449 2022 Cohort Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Hypoallergenic vs. CoCr unicompartmental knee arthroplasty — return-to-sport outcomes in metal-sensitive patients
36545926 2022 RCT Acta Orthop Cemented vs. cementless dual mobility cups: low Co-Cr serum levels at 6 years — safety finding confirming low ion release
35926884 2022 Cohort Can J Surg Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: whole blood Cr/Co at 1 year vs. 10 years — long-term ion level tracking
37652450 2023 Registry/Cohort Bone Joint J Birmingham Hip Resurfacing 20-year survivorship — long-term implant outcomes
22325959 2012 Observational J Arthroplasty Co/Cr ion release after large-diameter MoM THA — significant serum ion elevation observed post-implantation

⚠️ Evidence quality alert: None of the retrieved publications directly investigate trivalent chromium supplementation as a treatment for osteoarthritis. All literature is from the metal implant monitoring domain. The reverse causation problem identified in the clinical trials is equally present in the literature.


Singapore Market Information

Chromium (DB11136) is currently not registered as a pharmaceutical product in Singapore. No marketing authorizations or product licences were identified. It may be available as an unregulated dietary supplement, but this is outside the scope of drug registration.


Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Important valence-state distinction: Hexavalent chromium (Cr⁶⁺) is a well-established human carcinogen (IARC Group 1) and nephrotoxin. Any repurposing development must unambiguously specify trivalent chromium (Cr³⁺), which has a substantially different and more favourable safety profile. Formulation, dose, and valence state must be clearly defined before any clinical development proceeds.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Despite a high TxGNN prediction score (98.68%), the evidence base for chromium supplementation in osteoarthritis is critically undermined by reverse causation bias — the knowledge graph signal is driven by metal implant monitoring data, not therapeutic research. The sole directly relevant clinical trial was terminated early for unknown reasons, and no completed mechanistic or efficacy studies in OA are available.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Clarify termination reason for NCT00759993: contact ClinicalTrials.gov, the FDA, or the trial investigators to determine whether termination reflected safety concerns, efficacy failure, or administrative/funding issues
  • Commission a dedicated systematic review on trivalent chromium supplementation in musculoskeletal inflammation, clearly excluding metal implant literature
  • Obtain mechanistic data (MOA) specifically addressing trivalent chromium's effect on chondrocyte metabolism, cartilage matrix, and synovial inflammation in OA models
  • Evaluate the Rank 3 indication (Rheumatoid Arthritis) as a higher-priority entry point: a completed Phase 2/3 RCT comparing trivalent chromium vs. baricitinib (PMID 39030450, NCT05545020) already exists with L2 evidence and a "Proceed with Guardrails" recommendation — this represents a more viable and better-supported repurposing candidate for chromium
  • Obtain HSA/TFDA prescribing information to assess formal safety warnings and contraindications for chromium-containing preparations
  • Define the proposed dosage form and administration route for any future OA indication, as no Singapore-registered formulations currently exist

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 Yao.Care. For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.