Clioquinol

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Clioquinol
  2. Clioquinol: From Topical Antiseptic to Cutaneous Candidiasis
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Clioquinol: From Topical Antiseptic to Cutaneous Candidiasis

One-Sentence Summary

Clioquinol (Vioform) is a halogenated hydroxyquinoline derivative historically used as a topical antiseptic and antifungal agent, included in combination preparations such as Locacorten-Vioform for the treatment of infected dermatoses. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for Cutaneous Candidiasis, with 0 clinical trials and 6 publications currently supporting this direction. Evidence is based on older clinical comparison studies from the 1970s–1980s, and Clioquinol is currently not marketed in Singapore.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Topical antiseptic / infected dermatoses (historical combination preparations)
Predicted New Indication Cutaneous Candidiasis
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.84%
Evidence Level L3
Singapore Market Status ✗ Not Marketed
Number of Registrations 0
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Clioquinol (iodochlorhydroxyquin, brand name Vioform) is a chelating agent with broad-spectrum antimicrobial properties. Its principal mechanism of antifungal action involves metal chelation — it binds divalent and trivalent metal ions (Zn²⁺, Cu²⁺, Fe³⁺) that are essential cofactors for fungal metalloenzymes, disrupting cell membrane integrity and inhibiting fungal metabolic pathways. This mechanism is biologically plausible for activity against Candida albicans, which relies on metal-dependent enzymatic systems for growth and virulence.

Historically, clioquinol was a component of commercially available topical combination preparations — most notably Locacorten-Vioform (flucortolone + clioquinol 3%) and iodochlorhydroxyquin-hydrocortisone (I-HC). These products were used in clinical practice for dermatoses complicated by secondary bacterial or fungal infection, including cutaneous candidiasis. Several clinical studies from the 1970s–1980s directly compared clioquinol-containing preparations against other topical regimens in patients with confirmed cutaneous candidiasis, providing a historical basis for its anti-candidal efficacy.

The TxGNN prediction therefore reflects a pharmacologically coherent and historically validated mechanism. However, because all supporting studies are decades old, were performed with combination formulations (not clioquinol alone), and lack modern RCT designs, the evidence base is categorised as L3. No registered clinical trials are currently exploring this indication.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.


Literature Evidence

The following publications are relevant to clioquinol's use in cutaneous candidiasis. Note that most studies examined clioquinol as part of combination topical formulations (e.g., iodochlorhydroxyquin-hydrocortisone, Locacorten-Vioform), not as a monotherapy.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
128475 1975 Clinical study (double-blind) Dermatologica Locacorten (flucortolone 0.02%) + Vioform (clioquinol 3%) cream showed significantly superior microbiological conversion and clinical improvement compared to clioquinol alone, corticosteroid alone, or placebo in 430 patients with dermatoses complicated by secondary bacterial infection
155507 1979 Clinical comparison study Current Medical Research and Opinion Iodochlorhydroxyquin-hydrocortisone (I-HC) used as active control; overall therapeutic response in cutaneous candidiasis was 43% (17/40 patients), substantially lower than the comparator HNA cream (95%), highlighting the limitations of clioquinol combination preparations
6459255 1981 Randomised parallel study Journal of International Medical Research Randomised study of 154 patients (67 with cutaneous candidiasis); a combination containing iodochlorhydroxyquin showed equivalent therapeutic response to an HNN-containing cream, supporting the anti-candidal role of clioquinol in topical formulations
136333 1976 Clinical evaluation Current Therapeutic Research Clinical evaluation of a halcinonide-antifungal topical combination; limited abstract available
4220930 1965 Pathology/aetiology study Zeitschrift fur Haut- und Geschlechtskrankheiten Examined the role of yeasts in acrodermatitis enteropathica (Danbolt-Closs); contextual background on cutaneous candidal aetiology
2978600 1988 Occupational prevention study Przeglad Dermatologiczny In vitro assessment of additives to soap against Candida albicans strains; demonstrated strong fungicidal effect of clioquinol in alkaline soap solutions, providing mechanistic support for topical anti-candidal activity

Singapore Market Information

Clioquinol currently has no registered products in Singapore. There are no HSA-issued licences on record.


Safety Considerations

Detailed safety data (package insert warnings, contraindications, and drug interaction data) were not available in this evidence pack. The following considerations are drawn from publicly known information about this compound:

  • Historical neurological concern: Systemic use of clioquinol was associated with subacute myelo-optic neuropathy (SMON) in Japan (1960s–1970s), which led to the withdrawal of oral formulations in most countries. Topical formulations are generally considered to have a different safety profile due to limited systemic absorption, but this should be verified.
  • Topical absorption: Although systemic absorption via intact skin is low, absorption through broken or inflamed skin is possible.

Please refer to the package insert and regulatory guidance for complete safety information before any clinical consideration.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: Although clioquinol has a biologically plausible antifungal mechanism (metal chelation targeting Candida metalloenzymes) and historical clinical use in combination topical preparations for cutaneous candidiasis, all supporting literature dates from the 1970s–1980s and involves combination products rather than clioquinol monotherapy. There are no registered clinical trials, and the drug has no Singapore market presence, making regulatory and clinical development pathways unclear.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Mechanism of action data: Formal DrugBank/literature review to confirm the metal chelation mechanism and its relevance to C. albicans specifically
  • Modern safety assessment: Systematic review of topical safety profile, including systemic absorption risk via inflamed/broken skin in candidiasis patients
  • Regulatory status clarification: Confirm global regulatory status of topical clioquinol preparations and whether any jurisdiction maintains an approved topical indication
  • Comparative efficacy data: Head-to-head comparison with current standard-of-care topical antifungals (e.g., clotrimazole, miconazole) — clioquinol would need to demonstrate a meaningful advantage to justify further development
  • Formulation feasibility: Assess whether a standalone clioquinol topical preparation (not in combination) is viable, given that all historical preparations used it in fixed-dose combinations
  • Singapore registration pathway: If evidence supports continuation, consult HSA on the regulatory pathway for a product with no current Singapore registration

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 Yao.Care. For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.