Flunarizine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Flunarizine
  2. Flunarizine: From Unspecified Registered Indication to Migraine Disorder
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Flunarizine: From Unspecified Registered Indication to Migraine Disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Flunarizine is a calcium channel blocker with antihistaminic activity. The Singapore licence records compiled for this report do not state an approved indication. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for migraine disorder, which is already its established use as a migraine prophylactic in many countries, and so is an on-label use rather than true repurposing. Currently 14 clinical trials and 20 publications are listed for this direction, but most trials are comparator or indirect studies, and the completed trials do not clearly demonstrate efficacy.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not stated in the licence records (both approved indication fields are empty)
Predicted New Indication Migraine disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.12%
Evidence Level L1 (as assigned in the data compiled for this report; see the note in the clinical trial section)
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 2
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the source record. Based on the pharmacology compiled for this report, flunarizine is a selective calcium entry blocker with antihistaminic activity. It acts on T-type calcium channels (Cav3.1, Cav3.2, Cav3.3) and the D2 receptor. It is thought to reduce cortical spreading depression and neuronal hyperexcitability, both of which underlie migraine.

The record lists no original indication, so the migraine link comes from marketed use elsewhere rather than from the source record. Pharmacology data describe its main clinical use as migraine prophylaxis in a large number of countries. It is not FDA-approved. A 2023 European Headache Federation meta-analysis describes it as a repurposed first- or second-line migraine preventive.

Several related predictions (migraine with brainstem aura, headache disorder, susceptibility labels) fall in the same disease family. They mostly rest on migraine evidence rather than data specific to those entries.

Clinical Trial Evidence

The first 10 of the 14 registered trials are shown below. None is a completed Phase 3 trial, and no results are reported in the data compiled. The L1 grade therefore looks generous. The supporting literature (meta-analyses, guidelines) is stronger than the registered trials.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT06499116 Phase 4 Not yet recruiting 460 PREMI: primary-care comparison of amitriptyline, flunarizine, topiramate and propranolol for migraine prevention
NCT07655700 Phase 4 Not yet recruiting 177 Propranolol vs flunarizine vs combination for migraine prophylaxis
NCT02639598 Phase 4 Completed 62 Flunarizine 10 mg/day vs topiramate 50 mg/day for chronic migraine prophylaxis
NCT03712917 NA Completed 120 Greater occipital nerve block vs topiramate vs flunarizine in episodic migraine
NCT06162819 NA Unknown 84 Flunarizine vs amitriptyline for migraine prophylaxis
NCT07354126 NA Recruiting 44 Flunarizine vs propranolol in children aged 8-15 (PedMIDAS)
NCT07751497 Phase 2 Not yet recruiting 400 Rimegepant vs flunarizine non-inferiority in vestibular migraine prevention
NCT06753825 N/A Active, not recruiting 60 Pulsed radiofrequency vs calcium channel blockers in childhood migraine
NCT00752466 Phase 1 Completed 75 Pharmacokinetic interaction of flunarizine and topiramate (safety/DDI, not efficacy)
NCT07068815 Phase 1 Not yet recruiting 60 Fu's subcutaneous needling vs flunarizine in migraine without aura

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
37723437 2023 Meta-analysis J Headache Pain EHF systematic review and meta-analysis rating the evidence for flunarizine, a repurposed first- or second-line migraine preventive
42673583 2026 Systematic review / guideline Headache AAN/AHS systematic review of pharmacologic migraine prevention in adults
39365169 2024 Systematic review Health Technol Assess Preventive drugs for chronic migraine, with economic modelling
39388181 2024 Network meta-analysis JAMA Netw Open Efficacy and safety of preventive medications in pediatric migraine
31413170 2019 Guideline Neurology AAN/AHS update on pharmacologic prevention of pediatric migraine
40553594 2025 Meta-analysis J Assoc Physicians India Amitriptyline vs propranolol and flunarizine for migraine prophylaxis
37073858 2023 Systematic review Cochrane Database Syst Rev Pharmacological prophylaxis of vestibular migraine
1393843 1992 RCT Can J Neurol Sci Double-blind trial of flunarizine 10 mg daily vs propranolol in 94 patients; both reduced migraine frequency
1889980 1991 Review Headache Minireview: controlled studies, including placebo-controlled ones, establish flunarizine efficacy in migraine prophylaxis
30428122 2019 Clinical study Acta Neurol Scand Flunarizine plus supraorbital neurostimulation vs either alone for migraine prophylaxis

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN08250P FORKNOW TABLET 10 mg Tablet Not stated in the licence record
SIN09449P POLI-FLUNARIN CAPSULE 5 mg Capsule Not stated in the licence record

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

The following is limited to the drug-target data compiled for this report; no drug-drug interaction records were returned. Flunarizine acts on the D2 receptor and on the Cav3.1, Cav3.2 and Cav3.3 calcium channels.

Related literature notes the following, which should be confirmed against the package insert:

  • Extrapyramidal disturbances and depression are known side effects with chronic use.
  • A pharmacokinetic study with topiramate has been registered (NCT00752466), but its results are not available in the data compiled.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Migraine prophylaxis is flunarizine's established use in many countries, and meta-analyses and guidelines support it. The registered trials are mostly comparator or ongoing studies without reported results. The Singapore licences list no approved indication, and no package insert safety data are available.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from HSA (a blocking gap for safety screening)
  • The approved indication wording for the two Singapore licences
  • Confirmation of the mechanism of action from DrugBank
  • Reported results from completed head-to-head trials (e.g., NCT02639598, NCT03712917)
  • A safety monitoring plan for depression and extrapyramidal symptoms, especially in elderly and pediatric patients

Other predicted indications:

  • Headache disorder: Proceed with Guardrails, but it largely overlaps with migraine.
  • Migraine with brainstem aura, migraine susceptibility and trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia: research questions only (L4), with no registered trials. For trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia the support is case reports only.
  • Nephrogenic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis, atrophoderma vermiculata, ulerythema ophryogenesis, common cold and insomnia: Hold. These are prediction-only signals with no supporting evidence.

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.