Insulin Aspart

Evidence Level: L1 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Insulin Aspart
  2. Insulin Aspart: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Insulin Aspart: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

One-Sentence Summary

Insulin aspart is a rapid-acting insulin analogue, originally used to treat diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for type 1 diabetes mellitus, with 30 clinical trials and 20 publications currently supporting this direction. This is an established, labelled use of the drug rather than a true repurposing, so the high score mainly reflects existing clinical evidence.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Diabetes mellitus; diabetic ketoacidosis
Predicted New Indication Type 1 diabetes mellitus
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.95%
Evidence Level L1
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 8
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism of action data is not available. Based on known information, insulin aspart is a rapid-acting human insulin analogue. It is absorbed faster than regular human insulin after subcutaneous injection, and its efficacy in diabetes mellitus is well established.

Type 1 diabetes is characterised by absolute insulin deficiency, so replacing insulin is mechanistically direct. Insulin aspart is widely used as the mealtime (bolus) insulin in basal-bolus regimens, in insulin pumps (CSII), and in closed-loop systems. The link between the original indication and the predicted indication is therefore very close. The high TxGNN score is consistent with the extensive clinical evidence, and this should be viewed as confirmation of an existing use, not a new therapeutic discovery.

Clinical Trial Evidence

The data compiled for this report include 30 trials. The table lists the 10 most relevant, prioritising Phase 3 trials with direct evidence for insulin aspart.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00097071 Phase 3 Completed 299 Insulin aspart vs insulin lispro in insulin pumps in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
NCT02825251 Phase 3 Completed 472 Faster-acting insulin aspart vs NovoRapid® by CSII in adults with type 1 diabetes
NCT00595374 Phase 3 Completed 114 Insulin detemir + aspart vs NPH + aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes
NCT00322257 Phase 3 Terminated 596 Inhaled mealtime insulin vs subcutaneous insulin aspart (both with detemir), efficacy and pulmonary safety over 104 weeks
NCT00725036 Phase 3 Completed 305 Long-term safety of inhaled human insulin vs subcutaneous insulin aspart (both with NPH)
NCT01520818 Phase 3 Completed 666 Biphasic insulin aspart 50/70 vs biphasic human insulin 30 in type 1 or type 2 diabetes
NCT01467323 Phase 3 Completed 303 Biphasic insulin aspart 30 vs biphasic human insulin 30/70, twice daily, in type 1 and type 2 diabetes
NCT01999322 Phase 3 Completed 37 Compatibility and safety of faster aspart (FIAsp) and insulin aspart with an external insulin pump
NCT01486381 Phase 3 Completed 22 Long-term safety extension of biphasic insulin aspart 30 in young people with type 1 diabetes
NCT01848990 Phase 4 Completed 456 Hyaluronidase pre-administration with CSII: HbA1c and safety outcomes in type 1 diabetes

Literature Evidence

The table lists the 10 most relevant publications, prioritising RCTs and systematic reviews.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
36623517 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Degludec vs detemir, both with insulin aspart, in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes (non-inferiority trial)
37863084 2023 RCT Lancet Once-weekly icodec vs once-daily degludec in a basal-bolus regimen in type 1 diabetes (ONWARDS 6)
40445776 2025 RCT Diabetes Technol Ther Fully closed-loop delivery with faster insulin aspart improved glycaemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes
27362975 2016 Cochrane systematic review Cochrane Database Syst Rev Short-acting insulin analogues vs regular human insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes
23243636 2012 Systematic review Drugs Today (Barc) Insulin analogues, including rapid-acting aspart, for type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents
25644227 2015 Systematic review / meta-analysis Pol Arch Med Wewn Clinical efficacy and safety of insulin aspart vs regular human insulin in type 1 and type 2 diabetes
21333580 2011 Systematic review Diabetes Metab Efficacy and safety comparison of insulin aspart and regular human insulin
12215068 2002 Review Drugs Insulin aspart given before meals gave lower HbA1c than regular human insulin in type 1 diabetes
15329046 2004 Review Drugs Insulin aspart gave better HbA1c and postprandial control than regular human insulin in basal-bolus regimens
29978361 2019 Review Clin Pharmacokinet Faster insulin aspart as a new bolus option, with greater early glucose-lowering effect

Singapore Market Information

The data compiled for this report list 8 valid single-ingredient registrations. The approved indication text is not available for any of them. The five main authorizations are shown below.

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN12189P NovoRapid FlexPen Injection 100 u/ml Injection Not stated in registration data
SIN11394P NovoRapid Penfill Injection 100 u/ml Injection Not stated in registration data
SIN15995P Fiasp Solution for Injection in Vial 100U/ml Injection, solution Not stated in registration data
SIN15994P Fiasp FlexTouch 100U/ml Injection, solution Not stated in registration data
SIN15480P NovoMix® 30 Penfill® 100 U/ml Injection, suspension Not stated in registration data

Other registrations: Kirsty™ (SIN16868P pre-filled pen, SIN16867P vial) and Ryzodeg® FlexTouch® (SIN15706P).

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information. Interaction and contraindication data were not available for this report.

Other predicted indications also raise a safety point. The model's prediction of drug-induced localised lipodystrophy is more likely an adverse effect of insulin injections (lipohypertrophy/lipoatrophy) than a therapeutic use. It should be treated as a safety signal, such as injection-site rotation, not as a repurposing opportunity.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Multiple completed Phase 3 trials and several systematic reviews support insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes, and it is already marketed in Singapore under 8 registrations. Evidence is strong (L1), but this is an established use rather than a new one, and the safety information has gaps.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from HSA (currently missing and blocking safety screening)
  • Confirmation of the approved indication wording on each Singapore registration
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • A review of the other predicted indications. Several are computational predictions only (for example autoimmune oophoritis, opsismodysplasia, stiff person syndrome, centrifugal lipodystrophy) and should be held. Permanent neonatal diabetes and pancreatic agenesis are mechanistically plausible, but the evidence is indirect or limited to a single review.

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.