Insulin Detemir

Evidence Level: L1 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Insulin Detemir
  2. Insulin Detemir: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Insulin Detemir: From Diabetes Mellitus to Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

One-Sentence Summary

Insulin detemir is a long-acting basal insulin analogue, originally used to treat diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for type 1 diabetes mellitus, which is in fact already part of its established, marketed use rather than a true new indication. The data compiled for this report include 39 clinical trials and 20 publications that support this direction.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Diabetes mellitus; diabetic ketoacidosis (the Singapore licence records contain no indication text)
Predicted New Indication Type 1 diabetes mellitus
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.77%
Evidence Level L1
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 2
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, insulin detemir is a soluble, long-acting human insulin analogue. It binds to the insulin receptor and replaces deficient endogenous insulin. A fatty acid (myristic acid) modification allows it to bind reversibly to albumin, which gives slow absorption and an effect lasting up to 24 hours. The published reviews in the evidence set describe this profile.

Type 1 diabetes is a form of diabetes mellitus, the drug's original indication, and it is defined by absolute insulin deficiency. This makes it the classic setting for basal insulin replacement. The prediction is therefore reasonable, but it largely confirms existing on-label use rather than identifying a new therapeutic opportunity.

Other predictions (ranks 2–10) have no clinical trials or literature and are model output only. Examples include autoimmune oophoritis, opsismodysplasia and stiff person syndrome. Several likely reflect comorbidity or adverse-effect associations in the knowledge graph (for example, lipodystrophy is a known injection-site effect of insulin). Pancreatic agenesis is biologically plausible because insulin replacement is the standard treatment for the resulting diabetes, but it has no supporting studies here. None of these is recommended for advancement at this stage.

Clinical Trial Evidence

The data include 39 trials for type 1 diabetes. The 10 most relevant are listed below, prioritising those graded most relevant and then larger completed studies.

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00595374 Phase 3 Completed 114 Detemir + aspart vs NPH + aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes; efficacy and safety on blood glucose control
NCT00447382 Phase 3 Completed 330 12-month double-blind comparison of detemir from the current vs the NN729 production process, with aspart as bolus insulin
NCT00312156 Phase 3 Completed 347 Detemir vs NPH (each with aspart) in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
NCT00184639 Phase 3 Completed 71 32-week comparison of detemir and insulin semilente MC in patients aged 6–21 years
NCT00978627 Phase 3 Completed 548 IDegAsp once daily vs detemir + aspart basal-bolus in type 1 diabetes (detemir as comparator)
NCT01835431 Phase 3 Completed 362 IDegAsp vs detemir (each with aspart) in children and adolescents (detemir as comparator)
NCT00117780 Phase 4 Completed 520 Detemir once vs twice daily in a basal-bolus regimen with aspart; HbA1c and hypoglycaemia
NCT01542463 N/A Completed 4,464 Non-interventional study of safety, glycaemic control and weight in type 1 or type 2 diabetes
NCT00322257 Phase 3 Terminated 596 Inhaled vs injected mealtime insulin, both with detemir as basal insulin (indirect relevance)
NCT01440439 Phase 4 Unknown 30 Detemir vs glargine and glycaemic control during exercise

Most of the remaining trials are observational safety and effectiveness studies from Europe, Asia, Africa and North America, along with small pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. Several Phase 3 trials use detemir as a comparator or background insulin, so they support its use but do not test it as the primary intervention.

Literature Evidence

The 10 most relevant of the 20 publications are listed below, with randomised trials and systematic reviews prioritised.

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
36623517 2023 RCT Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol EXPECT: degludec vs detemir (both with aspart) in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes; non-inferiority trial
33662147 2021 Systematic review Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes, with a focus on complications and hypoglycaemia
29477399 2018 Network meta-analysis Value Health Relative efficacy and safety of basal insulin regimens in adults with type 1 diabetes
21878861 2011 Meta-analysis Pol Arch Med Wewn Detemir vs NPH insulin in type 1 diabetes
36763996 2022 Meta-analysis Clin Ther Efficacy and tolerability of degludec vs other long-acting analogues, including detemir
23243636 2012 Systematic review Drugs Today Insulin analogues, including detemir, for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes
17326333 2006 Review Vasc Health Risk Manag Detemir has a less variable pharmacokinetic profile than NPH or ultralente and may reduce hypoglycaemia risk
15516157 2004 Review Drugs Detemir has a more predictable, consistent effect than NPH insulin, with up to 24 hours of action
20539842 2010 Review Vasc Health Risk Manag Update on detemir as a basal analogue with a lower rate of hypoglycaemia
17881328 2007 Review Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am Pharmacology of detemir: B30 threonine removal and myristic acid acylation enabling albumin binding

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN13115P LEVEMIR® FLEXPEN® 100U/ML, 3ML Injection, solution Not recorded in the licence data
SIN15515P LEVEMIR® PENFILL® 100 U/ML Injection, solution Not recorded in the licence data

Both licences are valid single-ingredient products from Novo Nordisk, and none has been cancelled.

Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: The interaction screening returned 100 interacting drugs, and 20 were provided for review. Most are rated Moderate and a few are Minor. Examples are listed below.
    • Other glucose-lowering agents: metformin, pioglitazone, alogliptin and albiglutide
    • Sympathomimetics and bronchodilators: epinephrine, phenylephrine, pseudoephedrine, salbutamol and formoterol
    • Beta-blockers: acebutolol
    • Corticosteroids: hydrocortisone
    • Others: ethinylestradiol, estradiol, hydrochlorothiazide, acetazolamide, doxycycline, alpelisib and ethanol

Please refer to the package insert for warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: Multiple completed Phase 3 trials and several systematic reviews support insulin detemir in type 1 diabetes, and two licences are valid in Singapore. This is an established use, not a new indication. Any further work should be framed as confirming and positioning existing use. The other predicted indications (ranks 2–10) have no supporting evidence and should remain on Hold, except pancreatic agenesis, which is best treated as a research question.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from the HSA, which are currently missing
  • Mechanism of action data (for example from DrugBank)
  • The approved indication wording for the two Singapore licences
  • Confirmation that the Singapore labelled indication explicitly covers type 1 diabetes
  • For any rare-disease use such as pancreatic agenesis, a case series or other supporting clinical data

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.