Lacidipine

Evidence Level: L5 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Lacidipine
  2. Lacidipine: From Hypertension (Calcium Channel Blocker) to Migraine Disorder
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Lacidipine: From Hypertension (Calcium Channel Blocker) to Migraine Disorder

One-Sentence Summary

Lacidipine is a lipophilic dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blocker with vascular selectivity. The Singapore license data compiled for this report do not list an approved indication. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for migraine disorder, but there are currently 0 clinical trials and 0 publications directly supporting this prediction. It rests on model prediction only.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not stated in the Singapore license data (the drug class is used for hypertension)
Predicted New Indication Migraine disorder
TxGNN Prediction Score 98.34%
Evidence Level L5
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 1
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data are not available in the data compiled for this report. Based on known information, lacidipine is a dihydropyridine L-type calcium channel blocker that relaxes blood vessels and has vascular selectivity. Its efficacy as a class in vascular conditions is well established, so it may be mechanistically applicable to migraine.

Calcium channel modulation is biologically plausible in migraine. Another calcium channel blocker, flunarizine, is used for migraine prophylaxis. However, no trials or literature on lacidipine in migraine were retrieved, so the prediction currently reflects a class-level hypothesis, not lacidipine-specific proof.

Other predicted indications (for reference)

Predicted Indication Score Evidence Level Comment
Nephrogenic syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis 98.20% L5 No clear mechanistic link; likely a network-level association
Migraine with brainstem aura 98.07% L5 Subtype of migraine; same rationale as migraine
Pulmonary hypertension 97.89% L4 Plausible mechanism, but the retrieved papers are indirect
Kyphoscoliotic heart disease 97.61% L5 Speculative link via pulmonary vascular pressure
Alopecia 97.37% L5 Weak, unsupported link
Prinzmetal angina 97.33% L4 Calcium channel blockers are standard therapy for the class; no lacidipine-specific data
Raynaud disease 97.28% L4 Strong class-level rationale; the best candidate for follow-up (research question)
Hypotrichosis simplex of the scalp 97.13% L5 No mechanistic link
Congenital hypotrichosis milia 96.90% L5 No mechanistic link

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

Currently no related literature available for migraine disorder.

For reference, a few publications were retrieved for other predicted indications. They are indirect and none is specific to lacidipine:

PMID Year Type Journal Related Indication Key Findings
14689111 2003 Review Herz Prinzmetal angina General review of differential therapy with calcium antagonists
9471233 1997 Review Investigacion clinica Pulmonary hypertension Review of calcium antagonist actions and their role in arterial hypertension
8973777 1996 Review/Commentary Blood pressure. Supplement Pulmonary hypertension Commentary on hypertension and atherosclerosis, based on the MIDAS study (isradipine)
32337731 2020 Pharmacovigilance study British journal of clinical pharmacology Raynaud disease; pulmonary hypertension WHO pharmacovigilance signal matching generated drug-repurposing hypotheses for Raynaud's phenomenon

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN07934P LACIPIL TABLET 4 mg Tablet, film coated Not stated in the license data

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The migraine prediction has a high model score (98.34%) and a plausible class-level mechanism, but no lacidipine-specific trials or publications support it (Evidence Level L5). Safety information has not been obtained, so the candidate cannot yet move to safety screening.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • The Singapore package insert (warnings, contraindications, approved indication), which is a blocking gap
  • Mechanism of action data for lacidipine
  • Literature and trial searches specific to lacidipine in migraine, and a comparison with flunarizine
  • Consider prioritising Raynaud disease or Prinzmetal angina, where the class-level rationale is stronger, as an alternative or parallel direction
  • Confirmation of route and dosage-form compatibility (oral film-coated tablet only is currently registered)

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.