Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Evidence Level: L4 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Medroxyprogesterone Acetate
  2. Medroxyprogesterone Acetate: From Endometriosis to Amenorrhea
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Other Predicted Indications (for reference)
    10. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate: From Endometriosis to Amenorrhea

One-Sentence Summary

Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestin, originally used for endometriosis, endometrial cancer, postmenopausal osteoporosis and postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for amenorrhea, but no clinical trials are registered and the 20 publications retrieved are mostly contraception reviews, so the evidence is indirect.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Endometriosis, endometrial cancer, postmenopausal osteoporosis, postmenopausal atrophic vaginitis (the Singapore licence records contain no indication text)
Predicted New Indication Amenorrhea
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.999%
Evidence Level L4
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 3
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestin. Detailed mechanism of action data is not currently available. Based on known information, it belongs to the progestin class, its efficacy in endometriosis and endometrial conditions is established, and mechanistically it may be applicable to amenorrhea.

In secondary amenorrhea with adequate endogenous estrogen, a progestin withdrawal challenge induces endometrial shedding, so a plausible pharmacological rationale exists. The existing indications also involve progestin action on the endometrium, which supports the link.

However, the retrieved literature is dominated by contraception and Depo-Provera reviews. In those papers amenorrhea is an adverse effect or expected outcome, not a treatment target. Direct evidence for amenorrhea as a treatment indication is therefore lacking.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Currently no related clinical trials registered.

Literature Evidence

The retrieved publications are mainly reviews on contraception. The most relevant are listed below (abstracts were unavailable for several).

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
23641480 2013 Systematic review (Cochrane) Cochrane Database Syst Rev Combination injectable contraceptives are highly effective, but bleeding pattern changes may limit acceptability
18843662 2008 Systematic review (Cochrane) Cochrane Database Syst Rev Earlier version of the same review on combination injectable contraceptives
8178904 1994 Review Am J Obstet Gynecol DMPA 150 mg every 3 months has contraceptive efficacy above 99%; used by 30 million women in over 90 countries
8725701 1996 Review J Reprod Med Counselling and side-effect management for DMPA users
8829701 1996 Review Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud Long-acting contraceptive options, with pregnancy rates below 1 per 100 woman-years
6119259 1981 Review Int J Gynaecol Obstet Postpartum contraception; ovulation return is unpredictable regardless of postpartum amenorrhea
6141923 1984 Review Drug Intell Clin Pharm Drug-induced infertility through effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis
8492647 1993 Review MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs Depo-Provera overview
1604074 1992 Review Rev Med Liege Hormonal contraception overview
120837 1979 Review IARC Monogr Carcinogenic risk evaluation of medroxyprogesterone acetate

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN04540P Depo-Provera Sterile Aqueous Suspension 50 mg/ml Injection Not recorded
SIN03841P Provera Tablet 10 mg Tablet Not recorded
SIN10513P Provera Tablet 5 mg Tablet Not recorded

Safety Considerations

  • Contraindications suggested by the knowledge graph (not taken from label text; they need verification against the package insert): hypertension, liver disease and liver failure, kidney disease, gallbladder disease, epilepsy, diabetes mellitus and diabetic ketoacidosis, asthma, systemic lupus erythematosus, hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, hypercalcemia, hypertriglyceridemia, anxiety and related mood disorders, substance abuse/dependence, and female breast carcinoma.
  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were found. The 20 reviewed are all rated Moderate. They are mainly glucose-lowering drugs (metformin, acarbose, glimepiride, chlorpropamide, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, insulins). Others include dexamethasone, aprepitant, clarithromycin and pegvaliase.
  • Progestins are not indicated in pregnancy.

Please refer to the package insert for the full warnings and contraindications.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The prediction score is very high, but there are no registered trials and no direct clinical evidence for amenorrhea as a treatment target. The literature is mostly contraception reviews, where amenorrhea is a side effect. Safety data from the package insert are missing, and the knowledge graph flags many contraindicated conditions.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Package insert warnings and contraindications from HSA (required for safety screening)
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • Targeted literature search for clinical studies of progestin treatment in primary or secondary amenorrhea
  • Confirmation of the approved indications for each Singapore licence
  • Comparison with established progestin withdrawal protocols and a benefit-risk review for patients with the flagged comorbidities

Other Predicted Indications (for reference)

| Rank | Predicted Indication | Evidence Level | Note | |------|------|------|------| | 2 | Breast fibrocystic disease | L3 | Small, dated clinical reports (1983, 1988); HRT studies suggest progestin combinations may increase breast density, so benefit-risk is uncertain | | 3 | Benign mammary dysplasia | L4 | Same disease spectrum as above; no direct evidence | | 4 | Cervix endometriosis | L4 | Plausible extension of the endometriosis indication; retrieved literature is off-target | | 5 | Endometriosis of rectovaginal septum and vagina | L5 | Model inference only; often needs surgery | | 6 | Endometriosis in cutaneous scar | L5 | Model inference only; typically managed surgically | | 7-8 | Renal hypoplasia (bilateral / unspecified) | L5 | No plausible mechanism; likely a knowledge-graph artifact | | 9-10 | Blunt duct adenosis / apocrine adenosis of breast | L5 | Fibrocystic-spectrum lesions; no direct evidence |

Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.