Ustekinumab

Evidence Level: L2 Predicted Indications: 10

Table of Contents

  1. Ustekinumab
  2. Ustekinumab: From Psoriasis to Dermatitis
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Singapore Market Information
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## Pharmacist Assessment Report

Ustekinumab: From Psoriasis to Dermatitis

One-Sentence Summary

Ustekinumab is an IL-12/IL-23 antagonist originally used to treat psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and related conditions. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for dermatitis (mainly atopic dermatitis), with 6 clinical trials (2 directly relevant Phase 2 trials) and 20 publications currently supporting this direction. The direct evidence is limited to small Phase 2 studies that showed only modest and inconsistent benefit.


Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, parapsoriasis (the Singapore licence records contain no indication text)
Predicted New Indication Dermatitis
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.99%
Evidence Level L2
Singapore Market Status ✓ Marketed
Number of Registrations 5
Recommended Decision Hold

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Detailed mechanism of action data is not available in the compiled data. Based on known pharmacology, ustekinumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks the shared p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23. This suppresses Th1 and Th17 signalling, which is the basis of its efficacy in psoriasis.

Atopic dermatitis is driven mainly by Th2 pathways (IL-4/IL-13), although Th1, Th17 and Th22 activity contributes variably. The mechanistic fit is therefore partial. Any benefit is likely limited to subsets, such as Asian or intrinsic phenotypes or chronic lesions. Phase 2 data show only modest, inconsistent benefit.

The other top-ranked predictions (neonatal dermatomyositis, acne keloid, acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans, and others) have no trials or literature and are computational predictions only. The two pityriasis lichenoides predictions (ranks 9 and 10) are biologically plausible through their link to parapsoriasis, but also lack clinical evidence.


Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT01945086 Phase 2 Completed 79 Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of two ustekinumab doses in Japanese adults with severe atopic dermatitis. The strongest direct evidence, with modest efficacy
NCT01806662 Phase 2 Completed 32 Randomised pilot of ustekinumab in chronic atopic dermatitis with suboptimal response to prior therapy. Directly relevant but underpowered
NCT05535738 Phase 2/3 Active, not recruiting 45 Contact dermatitis model using biologics (including ustekinumab) to study skin inflammation. Mechanistic and exploratory
NCT07352566 Phase 4 Not yet recruiting 10 Microdevice for testing drugs directly in skin affected by atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Methodological, no efficacy conclusions
NCT02074982 Phase 3 Completed 676 CLEAR study of secukinumab vs ustekinumab in plaque psoriasis. Ustekinumab was the comparator, so it does not address dermatitis
NCT01356758 N/A Completed 126 Cardiovascular risk assessment in severe psoriasis patients on biologics. Not relevant to dermatitis efficacy

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
27304428 2017 RCT Experimental Dermatology Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 33 adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, assessing efficacy and safety of ustekinumab
28338223 2017 RCT (Phase 2) British Journal of Dermatology Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Japanese patients with severe atopic dermatitis
29164954 2018 Systematic review J Dermatol Treat Evaluated the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis
33074565 2021 Systematic review / meta-analysis Allergy Evidence appraisal of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, supporting EAACI guidelines
29098604 2018 Systematic review / meta-analysis Am J Clin Dermatol Examined whether biologics are efficacious in atopic dermatitis
33849369 2022 Real-world evidence analysis J Dermatol Treat Evaluated ustekinumab in atopic dermatitis; prior reports were anecdotal with conflicting results
36208443 2022 Review Dermatologic Therapy Synthesis of off-label uses of ustekinumab
32347968 2020 Review Contact Dermatitis Review of biologics in severe allergic contact dermatitis
32172523 2020 Review Clin Drug Investig Reviews atopic dermatitis agents that failed placebo-controlled trials, to identify reasons for failure
31514420 2019 Review Children (Basel) Biologic options, including off-label use, for paediatric psoriasis and atopic dermatitis

Singapore Market Information

Authorization Number Product Name Dosage Form Approved Indication
SIN13704P Stelara Solution for Injection 45mg/0.5 ml Injection, solution Not recorded in the data compiled for this report
SIN15438P Stelara Concentrate for Solution for Infusion 130mg/26ml Infusion, solution concentrate Not recorded in the data compiled for this report
SIN17103P Stelara Solution for Injection in Pre-filled Pen 90mg/1ml Injection, solution Not recorded in the data compiled for this report
SIN13995P Stelara Solution for Injection in Pre-filled Syringe 45mg/0.5ml Injection, solution Not recorded in the data compiled for this report
SIN13996P Stelara Solution for Injection in Pre-filled Syringe 90mg/1ml Injection, solution Not recorded in the data compiled for this report

All five registrations are valid single-ingredient products from Cilag AG, and none has been cancelled.


Safety Considerations

  • Drug Interactions: 100 interactions were identified, with the following examples listed.
    • Moderate: corticosteroids (hydrocortisone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone, betamethasone, budesonide, prednisone, prednisolone); anticoagulants (warfarin, apixaban, rivaroxaban, dicoumarol); simvastatin; radiopharmaceuticals and radioimmunotherapies (iobenguane I-131, ibritumomab tiuxetan, tositumomab).
    • Minor: zinc salts (sulfate, acetate, gluconate, chloride).

Package insert warnings and contraindications are not available in the compiled data. Please refer to the package insert for these.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Hold

Rationale: The evidence level is L2, based on small Phase 2 randomised trials in atopic dermatitis (n=79 and n=32–33) that showed only modest, inconsistent benefit. The mechanistic fit is partial, because atopic dermatitis is mainly Th2-driven. The package insert safety data are also missing. Newer targeted agents for atopic dermatitis may make this a lower priority.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • Singapore package insert warnings, contraindications and approved indication text
  • Detailed mechanism of action data
  • Adequately powered Phase 3 evidence, or identification of a responsive atopic dermatitis subgroup (for example, Asian or intrinsic phenotypes)
  • A review of how ustekinumab compares with currently approved atopic dermatitis therapies
  • A safety assessment covering the interactions listed above, particularly with corticosteroids and anticoagulants

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). For research purposes only. Not medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.