App Integration Assessment

Evaluation criteria for healthcare application integration.

Assessment Framework

When evaluating SMART on FHIR apps for clinical use, consider these dimensions:

1. Clinical Utility

Criterion	SgTxGNN Rating	Notes
Clear use case	High	Drug repurposing research
Evidence-based	High	TxGNN published in Nature Medicine
Actionable insights	Medium	Research guidance, not clinical decisions
Workflow integration	High	Embeds in medication review

2. Technical Quality

Criterion	SgTxGNN Rating	Notes
SMART compliance	Full	R4 compatible
Performance	Good	Lightweight, browser-based
Error handling	Good	Graceful degradation
Accessibility	Basic	WCAG 2.0 AA target

3. Security & Privacy

Criterion	SgTxGNN Rating	Notes
Data minimisation	Excellent	No data storage
Encryption	Full	HTTPS only
Authentication	Standard	OAuth 2.0 + PKCE
Audit trail	Limited	Browser logs only

4. Regulatory Compliance

Criterion	SgTxGNN Status	Notes
PDPA (Singapore)	Compliant	No personal data collected
Research use disclaimer	Present	All pages
Medical device classification	Not applicable	Information only

Risk Assessment

Benefits

Access to AI-driven drug repurposing insights
Integration with clinical workflow
No additional data collection
Research support tool

Risks

Risk	Likelihood	Impact	Mitigation
Misuse for clinical decisions	Low	High	Clear disclaimers
Data privacy concerns	Very Low	High	No data storage
Incorrect predictions	Medium	Medium	Evidence levels shown
System downtime	Low	Low	Static hosting

Institutional Checklist

Before deploying SgTxGNN:

Technical

EHR supports SMART on FHIR R4
Network allows HTTPS to sgtxgnn.yao.care
App registered with EHR vendor
Tested in sandbox environment

Clinical

Clinical champion identified
Use case approved by clinical informatics
Training materials prepared
Feedback mechanism established

Administrative

Privacy assessment completed
Security review passed
Terms of use accepted
Support contacts documented

Governance

App reviewed by relevant committee
Usage policies defined
Review schedule established
Incident response plan updated

Ongoing Monitoring

Metrics to Track

Number of launches per month
Error rates and types
User feedback scores
Clinical utility assessments

Review Schedule

Activity	Frequency
Usage metrics review	Monthly
User satisfaction survey	Quarterly
Security assessment	Annually
Clinical utility evaluation	Annually

Contact

For assessment support or questions:

GitHub Issues
Documentation: Technical Docs